CrazyBoards: Wellbutrin > SSRIs for neurocognitive function? - CrazyBoards

Jump to content

Wellbutrin > SSRIs for neurocognitive function? Abstract of interesting study... Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   cache-monkey 

  • Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 237
  • Joined: 01-June 05

Posted 09 June 2005 - 08:24 PM

Found this at:
https://www.cnsvs.co...id=43&Itemid=60

Quote

COMPARATIVE NEUROCOGNITIVE PERFORMANCE OF PATIENTS ON ANTIDEPRESSANTS

C Thomas Gualtieri MD Lynda G Johnson, PhD Kenneth B Benedicts, PhD
Ms Submitted for publication, November, 2004
ABSTRACT: Patients with depression have neuropsychological deficits in attention, memory, psychomotor speed, processing speed and executive function. When they are treated with effectively, their deficits tend to improve, but they do not normalize.

Is this a function of the relative neurocognitive effects of the various antidepressants? The clinical literature is meager on this question. METHOD: This report describes a naturalistic, cross-sectional study of 264 patients with major depression who were treated effectively with any one of eight modern antidepressants. A computerized neurocognitive screening battery was employed to measure neurocognitive performance. RESULTS: The neurocognitive performance of depressed patients on different antidepressants was significantly different. There were clear indications of a superior effect on neurocognition among patients on bupropion, in the domains of memory, reaction time and cognitive flexibility. Patients on venlafaxine and the SSRI’s (escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, citalopram,and sertraline) performed less well, but did not differ among themselves. CONCLUSIONS: In the clinic setting, computerized testing demonstrates small but significant differences in neurocognitive performance. The noradrenergic/dopaminergic antidepressant, bupropion is clearly superior to other modern antidepressants. The importance of these differences remains to be demonstrated; they may be less important in the face of differences in efficacy and side effect profiles in individual patients. It is arguable, however, that consideration of the neurocognitive effects of antidepressants could improve clinical outcome and reduce long term morbidity associated with treatment.

DX: Anxiety spectrum stuff (GAD, SP), Questionable BP NOS due to increased anxiety from most ADs
Current meds: Valium 15 mg/day; Magnesium 800 mg/day; 2.5 mg Prozac every other day
Rejected by my body: Lithium (kidneys), Tegretol (liver, allergy); Lamictal (allergy); verapamil (allergy)
Don't work/play so well with me: In terms of ADs: Wellbutrin monotherapy, Serzone, Serzone+Buspar and (worst of all) Cymbalta all made agitation/anxiety worse. Lexapro left me feeling a little shakey and out of it. In terms of mood-stabilizer-esque meds: Keppra, Campral (dulling, depression), Trileptal (same + probably allergic), AAPs (strong akathisia even at 2.5 mg Zyprexa or 50 mg Seroquel), Topomax (allergic? kidneys sure didn't like it) and really Depakote sucks balls too (dulling with agitation and anxiety).

#2 User is offline   Greenyflower 

  • WTF NOS
  • Pip
  • Group: Inmate Emeritus
  • Posts: 1649
  • Joined: 25-May 05

Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:49 PM

Quote

ABSTRACT: Patients with depression have neuropsychological deficits in attention, memory, psychomotor speed, processing speed and executive function. When they are treated with effectively, their deficits tend to improve, but they do not normalize.


That. Just. Sucks. I pretty much knew it all along, what with the paralyzed nonfunctionality and all, but it's certainly a punch to the gut to read it in a medical abstract.

Greeny
Posted Image

#3 Guest_coldverycold_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 09 June 2005 - 10:00 PM

Greenyflower, on Jun 9 2005, 09:49 PM, said:

Quote

ABSTRACT: Patients with depression have neuropsychological deficits in attention, memory, psychomotor speed, processing speed and executive function. When they are treated with effectively, their deficits tend to improve, but they do not normalize.


That. Just. Sucks. I pretty much knew it all along, what with the paralyzed nonfunctionality and all, but it's certainly a punch to the gut to read it in a medical abstract.

Greeny




I agree...and I do not agree.

I didn't read the whole thing, but it once again brings up the
word "normal", and lacks in how one is to define it.

As far as the "medical" abstract, we've supposed to share 50% of a banana's DNA.
They can a gemone, but they still can't define why we can feel things they way we do. My music may give you a headache, and vice versea.

Besides, I may be fat, but I don't look like a banana (I hope!) :P



Fast Reply