Jump to content
CrazyBoards.org

SheltieUnderdog

Member
  • Content Count

    85
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About SheltieUnderdog

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Ask Me
  • Location
    Central Jersey, USA
  • Interests
    Leisure Driving, Electric Guitar, Bass Guitar, TV, Movies, Shetland Sheepdogs, Parakeets, Listening To And Expanding My Music Collection, 1970's, 1980's, And 1990's Music And Culture.

Recent Profile Visitors

1,237 profile views
  1. I just want some clarification on this and when by default they started deploying hospital screeners and the police every single time someone utters anything related to having the desire to take part in any of these acts? When in the timeline of are species or domestically for the United States did threatening to commit suicide, saying you want to be euthanized, or the act of doing it become an issue that is not just a mental, emotional, and physical but also a legal one?
  2. No I am not and I'm not interested in ever seeing one either. They put you on a timer and I assume that they would have a gender and that there would be secondary aspects of gender expression in there also and for that reason I am not inclined to ever see any type of therapist or counselor ever again. I feel like I am not their species therefore anything they tell me based on being a functioning human-being will not be relevant. I do, however, take Latuda 40mg at the moment to prevent hallucinations and psychotic episodes from taking place. Sertraline 50mg is from my female urologist (not a false narrative from me) but I eventually will not need that as I am planning to become castrated in the next few years for physiological reasons (inflammatory disease of the scrotum and failed scrotoplasty) but also to come as close as possible in any way to representing self-reproductive hermaphroditism before I transfer to an oasis where there is no gender or possibly even sex and I exist as a hermaphrodite humiliating myself before the creator for sustenance. All I need is a different chromosomal arrangement, the presence of male and female gametes, a thoroughfare of fast food restaurants, the ability to fornicate with myself and grow hair, and picturesque sand and palm trees making therapy and counseling even more irrelevant for myself than it is now.
  3. You basically encountered someone who thinks that females should be able to grow full beards and that if they could that it should be accepted in the mainstream. And not just the small amounts that they typically wax off of their upper-lip and sides of their face. That becoming a reality would however jeopardize my fantasy of marrying a bearded woman in a traveling circus and getting away without having to contribute anything to society by being a stay-at-home or behind the scenes rather hermaphroditic husband who doesn't do any work and travels the country with her financially benefiting from her virility and good genetics. The proverbial Adam and Evelyn were androgynous. She had 49% of his strength and he had 49% of her beauty. After that it was all downhill from there for this species.
  4. My intelligence is in the average range (possibly due to a speed processing disorder and a 7th grade math level dragging it down), however I feel as if I am dealing with a polar mirrored opposite of myself the same way you are describing me from your end. Like I was literally just saying to myself as I responded, "How the fuck do all of these traditionalist 1-bit types possess such seemingly high intelligence and knowledge when they regard things the way they do?" "I think it's safe to say that the world would be a better place if they used their knowledge and intellect to fight for whatever equality can be achieved for the so-called human race and / or blending and eradicating cookie-cutterism." "Or if they just weren't intelligent at all, that would make proclaiming my views on gender expression inside of a Methodist church and getting my point across much easier." That is literally what I was saying to myself as I was responding to you. And normally Cerberus puts me into a fit of rage also except this time he didn't thus I chose not to argue any further points with him but you said that my post was bugging you and then I encountered your blog which mirrors what my blog would ever look like if I had one.
  5. End of rant? Its comments like this that aggravate my existence and my illness which is related to being incompatible my respective environment. This is how statments like "we may never become equal" keep being perpetuated. You decidedly declare my topic a rant and want to use your patriarchal influence and manner to put a premature end to it, not allow it to evolve or go anywhere, and in any way possible, and I'll repeat, just keep things like the collectivist, cookie-cutter, black and white crap that they are and go on arbitrarily getting married, having children, building the metaphorical arbitrary picket-fence which has no practical value and bringing the kids into and raised through hynosis and brainwashing into a world knowing that by the time they are 18 that one of them will be recommended to have a same-sex chaperone if seeing a male specialist and the other would be laughed at, ridiculed, and mocked for wanting the same thing while seeing a female specialist of the same kind or even just wanting a chaperone while seeing a male specialist. And I could also go into how a male is rarely ever questioned if he wants to undergo a vasectomy at a young age and is seemingly in good health but a female is turned down 9 out of 10 times if she wants tubal ligation surgery in her 20's or 30's if she hasn't had any children yet because of the false ethics system which is really just trying to prevent young women from being more in control over the eventual extinction of this species and the fact that young females in good health are seen as having significantly higher and more unique reproductive value than a male the same age and also in good health. Essentially, young men's reproductive health is seen as more disposable, generic, and might as well just sterilize him to profit off of the insurance companies to lessen the competition while young female's reproductive health is viewed as having incomparable value like nothing else and if too many of them proceed with tubal ligation then enough young men which are sex hungry and want the cookie-cutter arbitrary nuclear family will suffer for it. Well that's just too bad. If you don't like it then go seek help and talk with a female therapist since that's the same thing people like you tell me for not accepting that most of the world is like this. And were you saying what patriarch?
  6. Collectivist mainstream tribe argument. You are just assuming because of your expectation that most heterosexual males would be aroused by being touched by a female urologist that all of them do so the laws favor the expectation. Regardless of expectations of behaviors being different between the sexes, it still shouldn't determine how this area of preferential treatment is given unilaterally in favor of females like it is in most places of society. Based on what I see and hear, despite the fact that we obviously still exist in a patriarchal society which dictates why medical professionals with so-called ethics where women arbitrarily get preferential treatment compared to men 10 out of 10 times, you still see a ton of women on the news and all over the streets complaining about injustices related to gender trying to acquire more preferences while most men sit back and do nothing because of self-hatred and fear of how they will be perceived and taken and most likely if enough men do not jump on board with any hypothetical movement defending their sex, then their sub-collective such as MGTOW is seen as sexist, backwards, and inherently unattractive and they fear that women will stop having sex with them for joining it and supporting it. What I am basically pointing out is that because the female sex is obviously generally seen as more physically and emotionally attractive and that goes into this. In almost all parts of society and social situations, it is seen as more inherently attractive when a woman complains about a societal injustice over a man and when a man does it, then it's perceived as immature, unattractive, and gets him nowhere and he winds up going home and sleeping alone. How dare he open his mouth and voice a concern / opinion in defense of his sub-species right? Regardless of how asinine and clutching at straws you think my claims are, it is still sexist and if the whole thing was in favor of men you would probably be able to turn on the evening news and see a story about a group of women accompanied by some men doing something to change it. And based on the way that you are saying life is, then why do people still arbitrarily have the desire to procreate children and bring them into an existence with a by-the-motions, arbitrary species that doesn't try to suppress gender, generally doesn't like to view it as socially constructed and acknowledge it as a separate entity from sex, and even after the late 20th century assault on traditionalism, there are still scumbags out there willing to perpetuate late 1940's, full 1950's, and early 1960's traditionalist archaic gender norms after World War II which make situations like this surrounding sex even worse. Why would anyone want to procreate with all of this underlying collectivist, cookie-cutter shit probably still going on by the time the child reaches age 18 because the mainstream tribe cannot change or takes to long to change or their biology simply keeps them on an existential leash? Why not just go extinct and not arbitrarily so much like the instance of having children in the year 2020 has become, but go extinct to question why a creator would ever design something with so much potential fucking sexual and gender dimorphism that it goes beyond just keeping them on a biological leash and also creeps into their specialists offices? Even in a urologists office, half of the waiting room is made up of females because they almost arbitrarily care more about maintaining their health, caring about and maintaining themselves, or simply have more time to do it while men die slaving away on dangerous construction sites and have never seen a urologist in their entire lives while the average woman who lives down the street sees a urologist for a routine exam 3 times a year and she's never even had any bladder problems. Why not just go extinct and demand that the creator everyone to be a equivalent hermaphrodite or we will not exist? I know that's what I'm doing. All problems solved. Half or more of all conflicts and arguments on the internet erased and the internet can be used to educate rather than battle other collectives. Everyone can focus more on their individuality and never be a victim of any kind of collectivism which bypasses that such as gender norms and societal trends based around gender like all young girls expected to only wear leggings and not own a pair of pants in the year 2020 after Marilyn Monroe was already wearing pants in 1961. And don't turn around and tell me that hermaphrodites would still be hanging from the trees. There has never been a human one to be given the chance to prove that it could start piling up boulders and carve rocks.
  7. You only have concrete science which a higher power is likely responsible for. You cannot prove that upon death that the brain cannot transcend as part of the spirit when you are morally examined for all of your choices in life. And do you not see what I'm saying about the audacity. You are basically proving my point about most Atheists having that underlying quality. I don't think I've ever had a pleasant conversation with anyone who uses that label. And you understand that you are the one being more rigid and concrete here? I am being more flexible willing to admit that the Atheist hypothesis is remotely possible even though I choose not to entertain it.
  8. There is no scientific evidence to back that up from the Atheists point of view. And there is data sourced from people which have been declared dead and returned to life, I don't think any of them backed up what the Atheists proclaim, any of them. If Atheism is so great than why isn't it guiding you to control your emotions better right now?
  9. You cannot prove that there is no existence or realm that follows after death as much as I can't prove there is. But like I said, if the truth is that something follows life and it was created by a spiritual being, than the Atheists have the most to worry about because of believing that there is some kind of absence or void of existence and they find out there isn't and face something superior which examines them as Atheists. If there isn't than the religious followers, even Agnostics, have less to worry about either way.
  10. Whether there is a higher power / creator or not I would say that the Atheists are in a lose / lose situation wither way. If there is no so-called God then the religious followers have nothing to worry about either way and that outcome is a stalemate with the Atheists. If there is a God than it's the Atheists which have more to worry about and that is not for refusing to abide by an organized religion but for just outright refusing to believe in it.
  11. Well at least I could tell you that I believe that there is a high probability that my genetics represent human extinction 100 if not approximately 1000 years from now. What my parents did in the late 1980's was insane and unthinkable. I was conceived through insanity. Eventually humans will reach the point where their genetics are such shit that they will have absolutely no will to live and just want to end themselves. Just look at the youth of today compared to the youth of say London, England in the early to mid 1960's. It is already happening.
  12. Partially true but there have to be other factors going into someone opting to completely do away with the existence of a creator or a higher power which even the scientific Deists and Agnostics seem to admit is highly probable, preceding any theory with data to back it up. Being Agnostic or having a self-made religion is one thing if you want evidence but as far as I can understand, I would say that most Atheists are almost as rigid as certain organized religious followers like the modern Roman Catholics which are almost like Atheists at this point and would not believe any tangible evidence if it sat right in front of their face because the presence of a higher power for some reason insults them and intimidates them because a lot of them are audacious. A lot of it comes from audacity. Another thing which I'm pointing out is the incentive that Atheists have to convince themselves that there is not a higher power to most likely get away with not having a moral compass throughout life or less of one. It is one thing to refuse to assume to an organized religion and that is fine but denial of the existence of a higher power while there is a probability that you are inhabiting its planetary existence is insulting to the entity. There is also audacity in Atheists declaring themselves Atheists because it doesn't show itself and even if it did they would not believe in its existence. I communicated with a higher power during a high speed chase when I was off of my medication and went to state prison afterward. Like the Muslims state, it is actually sexless. Unlike what Muslims state it is also flexible. It can also lean more female or male to benefit its communication with you. The meaning of life is not conception, it is having a choice and free will. One thing that insults me about the species is that this entity told me that I could kill myself based on my life circumstances and I would not be punished and the species it I co-exist with inflicts punishments for making insinuations about it although it would be saddened by my absence. So essentially based on my own beliefs humans in general are more rigid and inflexible than the entity which put all of their sorry asses here. It also informed me that the species is also facing inevitable extinction before the end of this millennium because of the genetic cess pool or genetic slump that we are already starting to go through right now. All I can tell you is that individuals with a religion would seemingly have less to worry about after dying and facing a superior entity while Atheists definitely have more to worry about and more to explain upon their examination because of the denial of its existence. Atheists like I said nowadays, are almost worse than the traditionalist organized religious followers because there have been instances of Atheists telling me that my mental illness will improve upon refusing to believe in a God and that until then I will continue to suffer. I realize that you are not all the same but this actually has come out of the mouths of Atheists.
  13. You don't sound sorry to hear that at all. How the fuck am I even supposed to remember all of that when my IQ is around 95 and I have a speed processing disorder? Please God perform some kind hypnosis on the federal governments in first world countries convincing them to gradually legalize euthanization so I don't have to feel obliged to respond to comments like this... I will humiliate myself for you to encourage you to reward me. Humiliation and being pathetic rather than undertaking a challenge to sustain having a lifeform, fuck yes I would take that.
  14. No. I see no value in being challenged by anything and feeling like a warrior sounds unpleasant and intimidating to me. That sounds like it normally takes too long and involves a lot of psychiatric and psychological treatment. I would rather just take the first medication I found which prevents hallucinations (what has gotten me involuntarily institutionalized and arrested) and doesn't have intolerable amounts of akithisia even though they all make me morbidly obese. I am willing to do that because I don't like hallucinating. I am still somewhat delusional at times on this medicine and I have to admit that I like that because it keeps me occupied. I am actually less bored and feel more pleasure when I am delusional as long as I do not hallucinate. What is the point of coming back to reality when doing that is more challenging than being slightly delusional with no risk of it escalating and becoming acute psychosis.
  15. I don't even like chocolate and the pathetic fact that everyone from Oprah to my mother's side of the family in society is obsessed with it and always brings it up when referring to euphoria actually increases my suicidal ideation. I keep telling them that I do not like it and they can only remember if I keep torturing myself on a monthly basis reminding them that I would rather get something more complex like edible cookie dough rather than a block of chocolate shaped like an Easter bunny but they are so traditional, by-the-motions,, arbitrary, and stuck in their ways that I will eventually start giving me chocolate again like a revolving door of human stupidity and lack of effort. That's the genetics I come from. Yes, there is Italian in there.
×
×
  • Create New...