Klaein Posted September 24, 2010 Share Posted September 24, 2010 I have heard left and right that Remeron is indicated for the more serious types of depression rather than something mild like dysthymia (my type of depression). Funny thing is my pdoc says he uses it only for mild to moderate depression. Can it help dysthymia or would it be overkill? Perhaps keep the dose low? Is my pdoc full of shit? thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCatLady Posted September 24, 2010 Share Posted September 24, 2010 My husband was on it (until he lost his insurance) for moderate depression. He really liked it and said it made him feel so much better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tryp Posted September 24, 2010 Share Posted September 24, 2010 To be honest, I did really well on Remeron when I was only mildly depressed, but as soon as I really went downhill, it just couldn't cut it and I had to switch to an SSRI. It's really good for depression + anxiety though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudpuppy Posted September 24, 2010 Share Posted September 24, 2010 I don't really think Anti-depressants work that way. I don't think you can say that drug x works for mild depression and drug y works for severe depression. You can only say that drug x works for this person, or doesn't. Anti-depressant wise, you can't really find an anti-depressant that is "overkill". You can find yourself in a situation where the side-effects or restrictions associated with an anti-depressant have more of a negative impact than the depression itself did. This is especially true of drugs like MAOIs, which is why they are typically reserved for when all other treatments have failed. Certain drugs are also known for being more effective on treatment resistant depression, but again, that doesn't relate to the severity of the depression, it relates to how well it responds to medication. It could be "mild" depression that has not responded to multiple medications of different classes. Remeron is increasingly more popular with many pdocs for a few reasons. One, it can double as a sleep med, which means less medications rx'd to a patient. Less pills = higher likelihood of med compliance, and it saves the patient money. Two, it tends to begin working faster than some other anti-depressants. Three, it doesn't interact with many other medications, which makes it easier to add to combination therapies, or for people who take medications for unrelated ilnesses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rowen Posted September 25, 2010 Share Posted September 25, 2010 Remeron is nice for more severe depression for one of the reasons mud listed - it works faster. But honestly, like mud said, an AD is an AD. But if your depression is mild, maybe therapy would be a better option than taking meds, anyway. Unless it's more chronic and annoying, in which case an AD won't hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maceo Posted September 25, 2010 Share Posted September 25, 2010 I was taking it in addition to Effexor to help me sleep. I was severely depressed but the Remeron did not help with that. My guess is that they would reserve it for more severe cases because it's side-effect profile sucks compared to say Prozac. It is really sedating and causes sugar/carb craving and hence weight gain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mantra Posted September 27, 2010 Share Posted September 27, 2010 I don't think you can say that drug x works for mild depression and drug y works for severe depression. Yep, that's how I understand things. Remeron is usually considered a second-line antidepressant, after the usual suspects like SSRIs and SNRIs. So that may be where severity comes in--it's something to try after other classes haven't worked. Just a theory Compared to the joys of SSRI-induced akathisia and Parkinsonism, I'll take sleepiness and munchies any day I'm not surprised to hear it's becoming more popular. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jonathan Posted October 7, 2010 Share Posted October 7, 2010 I respond well to 30mg remeron as an AD for my bipolar 1 depression. SSRI's send me into crazy dysphoric mania. In my case I have had a very low side-effect profile. A little morning hangover, but considering my seroquel and depakote that's to be expected. Doesn't interact with my other meds for crohns disease. If you get the munchies on seroquel adding remeron might create a big weight gain issue though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nibblerd Posted October 7, 2010 Share Posted October 7, 2010 This is especially true of drugs like MAOIs, which is why they are typically reserved for when all other treatments have failed. Ah, thank gob for the discovery of the RIMA! One such reversible MAOI (type B, moclobemide) does not require a change in diet and does not require a 2 week wash. The downside is that it requires more doses to be taken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SashaSue Posted October 7, 2010 Share Posted October 7, 2010 I believe they're also significantly less effective than traditional MAOI's, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nibblerd Posted October 7, 2010 Share Posted October 7, 2010 I believe they're also significantly less effective than traditional MAOI's, no? Why would they be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudpuppy Posted October 7, 2010 Share Posted October 7, 2010 The few studies that were done in the US showed efficacy about comparable to SSRIs and TCAs, and less effective than traditional MAOIs. http://www.nature.com/npp/journal/v20/n3/full/1395258a.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nibblerd Posted October 7, 2010 Share Posted October 7, 2010 The few studies that were done in the US showed efficacy about comparable to SSRIs and TCAs, and less effective than traditional MAOIs. http://www.nature.co...l/1395258a.html Thanks for the link. That's a tiny difference, and I doubt it's because of their selectivity or the reversibility.. Such a small difference in efficacy is probably overwhelmed by the lower risk of hypertensive crisis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.