confused Posted May 27, 2014 Share Posted May 27, 2014 tim-murphy-doesnt-miss-a-beat-turning-tragedy-into-political-opportunity "I’m furious a Congressperson is using a tragedy for self-promotion. I’m furious that — suspending all logic — he somehow believes his bill will be endowed with magical powers to prevent future tragedies of this nature. A tragedy where the criminal was actually assessed by police with specific training to assess people who may be at risk at harming themselves or others." http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2014/05/26/tim-murphy-doesnt-miss-a-beat-turning-tragedy-into-political-opportunity/#.U4OlggWmkhQ.facebook Confusing Mental-Health Intervention and Violence Prevention "There are many ways to prevent some violent tragedies, including high-quality mental-health treatment at all levels. But calling for more involuntary hospitalizations isn’t among them. " http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/05/the-folly-of-conflating-mental-health-intervention-and-violence-prevention/371577/ This is some info on the bill. It is hard for me to know what it is exactly. I know there is a part about assisted outpatient- forced outpatient treatment. They just implemented that in my county but it is too soon to know anything here. And a loosening of HIPPAA rights http://murphy.house.gov/uploads/Four-page%20Summary%20Helping%20Families%20in%20MH%20Crisis%20Act.Apr.2014.pdf After mass shootings there has been a call for treatment of the mentally ill. I was mistakenly thinking that meant better access and treatment. Not a decrease in rights. I hadn't heard of this "After Adam Lanza’s killing spree at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut, there were calls for Three Strike mental health laws, where all protections against involuntary commitment to mental health facilities would be forfeited by the chronically mentally ill." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mellifluous Posted May 27, 2014 Share Posted May 27, 2014 I'm exhaustedly unsurprised. The courts already have way more power over some of us than you might think. The states isn't even the worst. Though also not the best, in my opinion, by any stretch. Cheers for sharing the info though; always good to know where one stands in the world. : ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobhope74 Posted May 27, 2014 Share Posted May 27, 2014 i agreeand i agree w/ the points made in the article that thiers no reoson to believe this bill would prevent future tragedys of this kind,but ide take it a step further and say not only would it not helpbut would hurt further alienateing ppl w/ mental illness who are untreated, and would actually prevent more ppl w/ MI from seeking treatment by increasing the real fear of loseing thier freedom,and of losing thier rights,i beleivefurther eroding the rights of the mentally ill and human rights in general would make things worsei find this scary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Posted May 27, 2014 Share Posted May 27, 2014 I find it scary too. Thanks for sharing the links. They're targeting mentally ill killers, mainly schizophrenics in the USA. I don't want to start a shitstorm or anything, but we rarely see anything like that in Canada. Better gun control maybe? Sorry. Off topic. I disagree with taking mentally ill in police cars. Ambulances, maybe with a police escort. But its so traumatizing to be thrown in a cop car. I've had police escorts to an ambulance, that was bad enough. Once at the hospital, the police left me with paramedics. But a three strikes law? What the hell. I don't think any of that will prevent much. It just makes the rest of the MI look bad. MI are more likely to be victims than commit the crime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mellifluous Posted May 27, 2014 Share Posted May 27, 2014 There are lots of people who are killers who aren't diagnosed with schizophrenia and a lot if assumptions made about murderers even ones with psych records. They're often not proved to have schizophrenia at all and I think that's important to recognize. USA or elsewhere. They're targeting schizophrenics much of the time, I agree, but making assumptions in most cases. It's bullshit and I don't think guns are necessarily the issue. I'm on a court order I've never even seen a real handgun. Plus they should show the stats for substance usage. If everyone with a substance issue were treated the way those with a schizophrenia diagnosis often are, due to increase in other directed violence when substance misuse/abide is involved, these fucking politicians would be singing a far different tune. I'm not saying anyone's rights should be compromised or that dehumanizing is ever ok. I'm just saying a lot more politicians have a soft spot or understanding for alcohol over psychosis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTastybutt Posted May 27, 2014 Share Posted May 27, 2014 I'm just saying a lot more politicians have a soft spot or understanding for alcohol over psychosis.So true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Posted May 27, 2014 Share Posted May 27, 2014 I hate how people think all killers are schizophrenic or psychotic and blah blah blah. It really irks me. Most aren't. Like melli said. But it makes for good news. *eyeroll* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ananke Posted May 27, 2014 Share Posted May 27, 2014 plus its easier to blame ''''scary mentally ill individuals''' than it is to discuss other contributing factors (e.g. gun control, police response, misogyny, etc) behind these kind of incidents. MI people are more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts